Managing allegations of scientific misconduct: a guidance document for editors.

How Journals and Institutions Can Work Together to Promote Responsible Conduct

There is limited formal guidance on how institutions and academic journals collaborate to promote responsible conduct of research. Since the issuance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guiding document, " Cooperation between research institutions and journals on integrity cases " (4), little else has been published on the topic. As a result, institutions are left to interpret—with va...

Cooperation between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (cope)

Institutions and journals both have important duties relating to research and publication misconduct. Institutions are responsible for the conduct of their researchers and for encouraging a healthy research environment. Journals are responsible for the conduct of their editors, for safeguarding the research record, and for ensuring the reliability of everything they publish. It is therefore imp...

Managing allegations of scientific misconduct and fraud: lessons from the "Hall affair".

Editorial research and the publication process in biomedicine and health: Report from the Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, December 2012

Despite the fact that there are more than twenty thousand biomedical journals in the world, research into the work of editors and publication process in biomedical and health care journals is rare. In December 2012, the Esteve Foundation, a non-profit scientific institution that fosters progress in pharmacotherapy by means of scientific communication and discussion organized a discussion group ...

Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals

BACKGROUND It is not clear which research misconduct policies are adopted by biomedical journals. This study assessed the prevalence and content policies of the most influential biomedical journals on misconduct and procedures for handling and responding to allegations of misconduct. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of misconduct policies of 399 high-impact biomedical journals in ...